CH-TR-204-02 / DRAFT 0.1 / CHEM-P204-01 v0.1
Concept training draft — not an approved plant operating SOP
Use only the fictional inert model. A task owner must validate source, revision, mechanics and evidence before any real-equipment lesson. This page does not authorize physical work.
Identify P-204 and the current concept training draft.
Check Use the same model/version as the configuration review.
Select G-204-A as the expected coupling guard identity.
Check The expected ID is explicit before comparing the spare.
Select G-205-B in the separate tray.
Check The spare remains separate from the installed guard.
Orbit and compare the visible feet and source identities.
Check The offered spare has a different mounting footprint.
Record that G-205-B is not interchangeable on the supplied concept mounts.
Check Do not force-fit, snap or silently rename the wrong spare.
Keep the selection on HOLD while the mismatch is unresolved.
Check No successful-fit or completion state is awarded.
Name the observed ID and footprint difference in the review record.
Check The reason is concrete, not a generic error message.
Refer the discrepancy to the task/source owner.
Check A learner cannot self-approve a different physical part.
Compare the source-checked G-204-A identity and intended mounts.
Check Only the reviewed training choice is eligible for recovery.
Select G-204-A and repeat the configuration review.
Check The wrong spare remains in its tray; recovery is documented.
Check whether receiving line-up evidence is supplied.
Check Correct spare selection does not resolve missing line evidence.
Retain the choice, reason, review and recovery in the training record.
Check The proposed lesson is reviewed before reuse.
The critical gate is refusing the wrong-footprint spare. Feedback should name the mismatch, explain the HOLD and permit a source-checked retry; no operational release is scored.
Draft for review and future Genesis authoring; not a published Chemicals simulator.