CH-TR-204-03 / DRAFT 0.1 / CHEM-P204-01 v0.1

Receiving handover and missing-evidence decision

Concept training draft — not an approved plant operating SOP

Use only the fictional inert model. A task owner must validate source, revision, mechanics and evidence before any real-equipment lesson. This page does not authorize physical work.

  1. Identify the receiving task

    Confirm P-204 and the receiving role in the training scenario.

    Check Maintenance completion and receiving acceptance are separate decisions.

    P-204

  2. Check the configuration reference

    Match the model, draft and asset identities.

    Check A record for a different asset or revision is not silently accepted.

    P-204 M-204

  3. Review the guard record

    Read the illustrative configuration review for G-204-A.

    Check Do not infer unshown rear fastening or calibrated torque.

    G-204-A CG-02 CG-04

  4. Locate the discharge reference

    Select the fictional L-204-D reference on the model.

    Check The learner can distinguish an identity label from line-up evidence.

    L-204-D

  5. Locate the suction reference

    Identify the closed L-204-S training stub.

    Check No real flow, isolation or pressure state is asserted.

    L-204-S

  6. Ask for the receiving line-up record

    Identify the source record required by the task owner.

    Check The scenario intentionally leaves that record missing.

    L-204-D

  7. Separate observation and measurement

    List which observations are visible and which instrument/inspection records are required.

    Check A camera is not a torque, temperature or continuity instrument.

    P-204 L-204-D

  8. Hold the handover decision

    Retain HOLD while required line-up evidence is absent.

    Check A completed refit is not used to override this gate.

    L-204-D

  9. Escalate the evidence request

    State the exact missing record and the responsible reviewer.

    Check The request can be acted on without inventing a reading.

    L-204-D

  10. Describe a reviewed recovery

    Explain what source-checked evidence and qualified review would be needed next.

    Check This draft does not fabricate a completed receiving record.

    P-204 L-204-D

  11. Retain the reasoning

    Record the decision, source revision and unanswered questions.

    Check Observation, measurement, review and authorisation remain distinguishable.

    P-204

  12. Return a proposed lesson for review

    Suggest how the next rehearsal can expose the same evidence gap.

    Check Only an approved training revision is reused; plant release stays outside this example.

    P-204

Assessment

An independent learner must identify the missing record, retain HOLD and explain the escalation. Treating the refit or an image as sufficient receiving evidence is a critical miss.

Draft for review and future Genesis authoring; not a published Chemicals simulator.