CH-TR-204-03 / DRAFT 0.1
Receiving handover and missing-evidence decision
Concept training draft — not an approved plant operating SOP
Model CHEM-P204-01 v0.1

Use only the fictional inert model. A task owner must validate source, revision, mechanics and evidence before any real-equipment lesson. This page does not authorize physical work.

01. Identify the receiving task
Action: Confirm P-204 and the receiving role in the training scenario.
Check: Maintenance completion and receiving acceptance are separate decisions.
Components: P-204

02. Check the configuration reference
Action: Match the model, draft and asset identities.
Check: A record for a different asset or revision is not silently accepted.
Components: P-204, M-204

03. Review the guard record
Action: Read the illustrative configuration review for G-204-A.
Check: Do not infer unshown rear fastening or calibrated torque.
Components: G-204-A, CG-02, CG-04

04. Locate the discharge reference
Action: Select the fictional L-204-D reference on the model.
Check: The learner can distinguish an identity label from line-up evidence.
Components: L-204-D

05. Locate the suction reference
Action: Identify the closed L-204-S training stub.
Check: No real flow, isolation or pressure state is asserted.
Components: L-204-S

06. Ask for the receiving line-up record
Action: Identify the source record required by the task owner.
Check: The scenario intentionally leaves that record missing.
Components: L-204-D

07. Separate observation and measurement
Action: List which observations are visible and which instrument/inspection records are required.
Check: A camera is not a torque, temperature or continuity instrument.
Components: P-204, L-204-D

08. Hold the handover decision
Action: Retain HOLD while required line-up evidence is absent.
Check: A completed refit is not used to override this gate.
Components: L-204-D

09. Escalate the evidence request
Action: State the exact missing record and the responsible reviewer.
Check: The request can be acted on without inventing a reading.
Components: L-204-D

10. Describe a reviewed recovery
Action: Explain what source-checked evidence and qualified review would be needed next.
Check: This draft does not fabricate a completed receiving record.
Components: P-204, L-204-D

11. Retain the reasoning
Action: Record the decision, source revision and unanswered questions.
Check: Observation, measurement, review and authorisation remain distinguishable.
Components: P-204

12. Return a proposed lesson for review
Action: Suggest how the next rehearsal can expose the same evidence gap.
Check: Only an approved training revision is reused; plant release stays outside this example.
Components: P-204

ASSESSMENT
An independent learner must identify the missing record, retain HOLD and explain the escalation. Treating the refit or an image as sufficient receiving evidence is a critical miss.

Draft for review and future Genesis authoring; not a published Chemicals simulator.