An EON AI Ventures company ↗

CH-TR-204-02 / DRAFT 0.1

Wrong-spare choice, HOLD and reviewed recovery

Practise a meaningful wrong choice and recover through source comparison rather than forcing a mismatched part.

CONCEPT TRAINING DRAFT · NOT AN APPROVED PLANT OPERATING SOP

Use only the fictional inert model. A task owner must validate source, revision, mechanics and evidence before any real-equipment lesson. This page does not authorize physical work.

Model CHEM-P204-01 v0.1 · 12 steps · authored for review

  1. 01

    Confirm the task context

    Identify P-204 and the current concept training draft.

    Check Use the same model/version as the configuration review.

  2. 02

    Locate the expected part

    Select G-204-A as the expected coupling guard identity.

    Check The expected ID is explicit before comparing the spare.

  3. 03

    Inspect the offered spare

    Select G-205-B in the separate tray.

    Check The spare remains separate from the installed guard.

  4. 04

    Compare the two footprints

    Orbit and compare the visible feet and source identities.

    Check The offered spare has a different mounting footprint.

  5. 05

    Make the choice visible

    Record that G-205-B is not interchangeable on the supplied concept mounts.

    Check Do not force-fit, snap or silently rename the wrong spare.

  6. 06

    Hold the proposed step

    Keep the selection on HOLD while the mismatch is unresolved.

    Check No successful-fit or completion state is awarded.

  7. 07

    Explain the mismatch

    Name the observed ID and footprint difference in the review record.

    Check The reason is concrete, not a generic error message.

  8. 08

    Request qualified review

    Refer the discrepancy to the task/source owner.

    Check A learner cannot self-approve a different physical part.

  9. 09

    Review the correct training source

    Compare the source-checked G-204-A identity and intended mounts.

    Check Only the reviewed training choice is eligible for recovery.

  10. 10

    Recover the training decision

    Select G-204-A and repeat the configuration review.

    Check The wrong spare remains in its tray; recovery is documented.

  11. 11

    Keep independent evidence gaps open

    Check whether receiving line-up evidence is supplied.

    Check Correct spare selection does not resolve missing line evidence.

  12. 12

    Record feedback for the next rehearsal

    Retain the choice, reason, review and recovery in the training record.

    Check The proposed lesson is reviewed before reuse.

Assessment and completion

The critical gate is refusing the wrong-footprint spare. Feedback should name the mismatch, explain the HOLD and permit a source-checked retry; no operational release is scored.

Draft for review and future Genesis authoring; not a published Chemicals simulator.

Product access and lesson status ↗