CH-TR-204-02 / DRAFT 0.1
Wrong-spare choice, HOLD and reviewed recovery
Practise a meaningful wrong choice and recover through source comparison rather than forcing a mismatched part.
CONCEPT TRAINING DRAFT · NOT AN APPROVED PLANT OPERATING SOP
Use only the fictional inert model. A task owner must validate source, revision, mechanics and evidence before any real-equipment lesson. This page does not authorize physical work.
Model CHEM-P204-01 v0.1 · 12 steps · authored for review
-
01
Confirm the task context
Identify P-204 and the current concept training draft.
Check Use the same model/version as the configuration review.
-
02
Locate the expected part
Select G-204-A as the expected coupling guard identity.
Check The expected ID is explicit before comparing the spare.
-
03
Inspect the offered spare
Select G-205-B in the separate tray.
Check The spare remains separate from the installed guard.
- 04
-
05
Make the choice visible
Record that G-205-B is not interchangeable on the supplied concept mounts.
Check Do not force-fit, snap or silently rename the wrong spare.
-
06
Hold the proposed step
Keep the selection on HOLD while the mismatch is unresolved.
Check No successful-fit or completion state is awarded.
- 07
-
08
Request qualified review
Refer the discrepancy to the task/source owner.
Check A learner cannot self-approve a different physical part.
-
09
Review the correct training source
Compare the source-checked G-204-A identity and intended mounts.
Check Only the reviewed training choice is eligible for recovery.
- 10
-
11
Keep independent evidence gaps open
Check whether receiving line-up evidence is supplied.
Check Correct spare selection does not resolve missing line evidence.
- 12
Assessment and completion
The critical gate is refusing the wrong-footprint spare. Feedback should name the mismatch, explain the HOLD and permit a source-checked retry; no operational release is scored.
Draft for review and future Genesis authoring; not a published Chemicals simulator.
Product access and lesson status ↗